A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY
Of course, the St'at'imc have been well aware of the illegal theft andoccupation of their territory. IN 1911, leaders of the St'at'imc signed a declaration, stating in part:
1911 Declaration of the Lillooet Tribe (St'at'imc)
At this time, the St'at'imc and many other nations formed politicalorganizations such as the Indian Rights Association (IRA) and the Allied Tribes of BC. They correctly understood that, without treaties, the province of BC and Canada were in violation of the 1763 Royal Proclamation. They sought to hold the government accountable to its own laws.
150 YEARS ON STOLEN LAND
For over 150 years, the St'at'imc - like other First Nations - haveseen their way of life nearly destroyed, their ancestral territories claimed by European settlers and colonial authorities. Beginning in 1858 with the discovery of gold, tens of thousands of prospectors invaded the southern Interior. They brought diseases which decimated the St'at'imc and other Interior nations (as occurred on the coast); in some cases, villages saw 90% of their populations die.
By the 1920s railway lines had been punched through, increasingEuropean settlement and resource extraction (logging and mining). In the meantime, First Nations were forced onto small reserves and generations of Indigenous children placed in Residential Schools. In the 1950s and '60s, hydro-electric dams and power plants were established, destroying or reducing entire salmon runs in the Bridge and Seton Rivers. By the 1970s, clearcut logging and road building scarred many valleys and mountain- sides.
BACK TO THE FUTURE
In 1990, the BC government began an expansion of Highway 99, upgradinga logging road that cut through the Melvin Creek watershed. In order to connect this road to Hwy. 99, the provincial government expropriated a portion of the Mt. Currie reserve, using a section of the Indian Act. This created a groundswell of opposition among the Lil'wat of Mt. Currie, who blockaded the Duffy Lake road. A large RCMP operation resulted in 63 arrests in the fall of 1990. Those arrested were held one month, refusing to give their names or co-operate. The next year, as highway construction proceeded, the government announced it was seeking proposals for a ski resort development in the Melvin Creek area - a project only possible with the forced expansion of Hwy. 99.
NOT ANOTHER SKI RESORT
In 1991, in response to the government's proposal, Nancy Greene-Raineresort consultants Inc. (NGR), submitted plans for the Cayoosh Ski Resort, a $500-million all-season ski and recreation resort, with an upper and lower village, a 12 km access road to the upper village, 14 lifts, a conference centre, skiing, hiking, horseback riding, and as many as 12,000 daily visitors with accommodation for 14,000 (2,000 for staff).
NGR Inc. is owned by Nancy Greene, a former Olympic gold medallist, andher husband Al Raine. NGR has also been involved in a bitter struggle for the past 3 years with the Secwepemc nation over a $70 million expansion to the Sun Peaks ski resort, located 1 hours drive north of Kamloops.
Initially, the government's own Environment Ministry, Kamloops region,advised against any development in the Cayoosh and Melvin Creek watersheds, citing high wildlife values, especially Grizzly Bear and Mountain Goat habitat.
In 1993, NGR withdrew their proposal. Intervention by high-rankinggovernment officials, however, renewed the Cayoosh proposal and created political pressure to force it through. in 1994, Employment minister Glen Clark met with Al Raine. Following this, Raine stated he was "very encouraged by the new attitude of cooperation." The following year, the BC cabinet overruled the Kamloops office's original decision, and in 1996 NGR applied fore project approval certification through the BC government's Environmental Assessment Office (EAO).
Over the years, reports and studies submitted to the EAO have failed tomention, or downplayed, both Grizzly and Mountain Goat habitat and negative environmental impact. Finally, on August 14, 2000, the EAO gave its approval for the Cayoosh ski resort. The EAO is considered the most 'difficult' phase for a project of this size and nature to pass. Now, all that remains is for NGR to receive a master development agreement as required under the Commercial Alpine Ski Policy (CASP).
The CASP is a responsibility of Land and Water, BC, Inc. (formerly BCAssets and Lands Corporation), a government agency created to sell, lease and 'develop' Crown lands. This final stage is a technicality and it is expected that by 2003-04, the final go-ahead will be given. As of Spring 2003, Sutikalh still remains and no construction or logging has occurred.
ST'AT'IMC MAKE THEIR STAND AT SUTIKALH
Just as the EAO process neared completion in 2000, the alarm wassounded. On May 2/00, the Sutikalh camp was established, and before the month ended it was decided to make it a permanent camp. From the beginning, Sutikalh has served as a rallying point for the St'at'imc. On June 11/00, over 120 people gathered at Sutikalh, including members from all 11 St'at'imc communities. The meeting overwhelmingly rejected the ski resort.
Throughout June and July, more permanent structures were built,including construction of an Estken (a traditional pit-house). From July 27 to August 4/00, some 40 children and youth attended the camp, gathering food and medicines and participating in cultural activities.
They also helped distribute 1500 pamphlets and collect hundreds ofsignatures on a petition opposed to the ski resort. On August 14/00, when the EAO gave its approval to NGR, the St'at'imc set up an information checkpoint at Sutikalh on Hwy. 99 for 17 hours.
In Vancouver, St'at'imc representatives and several Aboriginalpolitical organizations, along with environmentalists, protested outside the Vancouver Stock Exchange (to deter potential investors).
This grassroots organizing helped put pressure on all 11 St'at'imc bandcouncils to come out in opposition to the ski resort, event through some chiefs and councilors actually support development. On August 17/00, the Lillooet Tribal Council issued a letter to NGR, signed by all 11 chiefs, rejecting the ski resort.
On October 2/00, a referendum on the ski resort was held in Mt. Currie,the closest and largest St'at'imc community to the Melvin Creek area. Of 3324 votes cast, 276 voted No, with 46 voting Yes.
The St'at'imc have also received public support from various Aboriginalgroups, including the Interior Alliance (band councils of the Southern Carrier, St'at'imc, Secwepemc, Nlaka'pamux and Okanagain), the Union of BC Indian Chiefs (UBCIC), the Native Youth Movement (NYM), and the Cheam First Nation.
Several environmental groups are also opposed to the Cayoosh skiresort, including the Society Promoting Environmental Conservation (SPEC), the Western Canada Wilderness Committee (WCWC), Sierra Club and even former government biologists.
BIG $ FOR BC GOVERNMENT
Despite government and corporate claims that there will be noenvironmental impact, it is obvious to anyone that a $500 million ski resort, with accommodations for 14,000 people, will have a major impact on wildlife habitat and ecosysterms. According to a financial analysis and market assessment by the EAO, the BC government stands to gain the most with an estimated $1.1 billion in revenue upon project completion.
economically from a project of this nature compared to possible returns to the applicant (NGR) and associated investors. This point of view ignores any environmental impacts..."
Executive Summary - Review of the Market Assessment and FinancialAnalysis, EAO.
After 2 and 1/2 years, Sutikalh continues to represent the will of theSt'at'imc to protect one of the last, untouched mountain areas in their ancestral territory. It is also a model for other First Nations seeking to reoccupy traditional land and/or stop further destruction of territory by government and corporations.
STAND STRONG WITH SUTIKALH - HELP STOP THE CAYOOSH SKI RESORT!
|This page was put together by the Resist! Collective to support the work of those defending Melvin Creek. Text and artwork on this site comes from camp occupants and involved supporters. For further information, please contact Rosalin Sam at email@example.com|